Elephant Ears

This blog is dedicated to the political happenings in the Valley and Southwest Virginia. As the the name implies, this blog will have posts based on what is heard by this elephant's (GOPer's) ears. It is also a great treat to get while at the county fair or a carnival.

Sunday, April 30, 2006

Senate Redistricting

In 2010, the State Senate map will not have massive changes, but there will be a few line adjustments. For the purposes of this analysis we will assume total GOP control again, due to the unlikely event of total dem control and the only thing that will happen in a divided gov't will be technical adjustments.

As NLS told us, NOVA and its "exurbs" will gain almost 2 seats in the Senate in 2010. These 2 seats will come from no particular area downstate, but the biggest loss areas will be inner hampton roads, southside and southwest.

The first likely seat change will be along the "northern neck". It looks like Chichester's 28th district will lose Stafford County and gain Essex, Middlesex, King William, King & Queen and Glouester Counties along the Bay. This will then push McDougle's 4th district seat back to just Hanover, Caroline, part of Spotsylvania and maybe New Kent and/or Henrico. Ed Houck's 17th will then stay the same (athough the GOP would probably try to draw Houck out of the district), creating a new district anchored by Stafford County with Fredericksburg and a small piece of PWC finishing out the 200k people. This seat will likely go GOP as Stafford County still seems to be a GOP stronghold.

NOVA will be the site of the second new seat, but its hard to say how exactly it will be drawn. Much of this depends on who is in what seats come 2010. Russ Potts' district will probably lose Fauquier County, freeing it up to help prop up other NOVA seats, unless Jill Holtzman-Vogel is the Senator there. If she is the Senator, Loudoun will likely only be a small sliver of the district while most Fauquier would fall into the 27th. If Mark Tate or someone other than Jill is there, Fauquier will probably be eliminated from the district, giving more of Loudoun to the 27th. This then spills over into the rest of the seats.

Loudoun will have to have at least 2 seats partially within the County. If Mark Herring is still in the 33rd, we could see a seat that takes all of Fauquier and most of Leesburg (excluding Herring's house) while the 33rd would basically lose the western part of Leesburg while gaining a small amount of Fairfax. This would hopefully result in another GOP seat. Another possibility is to draw a Leesburg based seat totally in Loudoun County, which would then dump the eastern-most Loudoun precincts into a Fairfax seat. This would probably only happen if a GOP is back in the 33rd, and if they are from Leesburg (or the surrounding area).

In Prince William, if O'Brien is still alive look for the map drawers to give him a bigger portion of PWC as his base and pull him out of his weakest Fairfax precincts. If Cuccinelli is gone, they may destroy the 37th and give O'Brien the strong precincts and make a "new 37th" with the east Loudoun and west Fairfax precincts that would be left over. The other part of PWC will still be a 29th that keeps Manassas and loses the weakest precincts in the south to the new Stafford seat or the 36th. They could even use Fauquier to prop up a PWC seat, but as I mentioned eariler, its all about where everyone is.

In Fairfax, there are alot of scenarios. JeanneMarie, Cooch and O'Brien could all go down in '07, they could all survive, or a combination. If all three survive, the map drawers will just do their best to divy up the strong Fairfax precincts among the three seats. If all three lose, they will probably try to draw a GOP 39th and a dem 34th and 37th. This is also the scenario if only O'Brien survives 2007. Currently, Cuccinelli looks the most vunerable in '07. If only he loses, the 37th will probably be destroyed and give his stronger precincts to the 34th and 39th while his weak ones go into the western Fairfax, east Loudoun seat. If only Jeannemarie loses, her strong precincts will go to Cooch while her weak ones go to all the other dem seats. If only O'Brien loses (which I would say is pretty unlikely), his PWC precincts would be used in the 29th while his Fairfax precincts go to Cooch. Basically, Fairfax will probably be a nightmare for GOP drawers in 2010 unless they only need to draw themselves one seat (most likely O'Brien). Otherwise, the line drawers may have to draw 3 sub-50% districts just to keep them all competitive (depending on future trends here).

As for where the seats will come from, the GOP will likely try to elminate Roscoe Reynolds in SWVA if he is still there. This will be hard to do though, since the districts are already huge. The second downstate seat to be lost will probably be one from the current 3rd congressional district area. Even so, the 2 seats will be spread out over a large area, not pinpointed to 3 or 4 counties.

This will all result in a likely net change of zero. If the GOP loses all three Fairfax seats in 2007, they may be able to get the 39th back under this scenario. They also may be able to get the 17th and 20th into their column by drawing out the long running incumbents in those areas. Other than that, there probably won't be any major changes. Even so, just one seat may be the difference in who holds the majority after the 2011 elections.

11 Comments:

  • At 5/08/2006 9:12 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    GOP Hokie:

    I know you're focused on Loudoun & PWC alot, but South County, Fairfax County (Lorton, Laurel Hill, Southern Springfield), will have gained about about 30-40,000 new residents from 2000-2010. It's been the highest growth part of Fairfax County this decade and probably one of the higher growth parts of the state. Nearly, all of it is in Sen. Puller's district.

    It seems to me her district is like to constrict losing southern precincts, opening up more PWC precincts for someone, unless they double her up.

    It seems to be someone's else has to take Democratic leaning Occoquan/Quantico/Woodbridge - Colgan or O'Brien. Neither of whom probably want it. I would think it give O'Brien serious headaches in 2011. O'Brien is increasingly pinched due to demographics.

    Thoughts?

     
  • At 5/08/2006 10:17 AM, Blogger GOPHokie said…

    There are alot of ways they can psuh districts around. O'Brien will probably keep all the GOP precincts in his area and Puller will get the bad ones.
    Also, the new Stafford seat could take some of south PWC and push Puller's district back toward Fairfax.

     
  • At 5/08/2006 11:29 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    If the Senate remains in the control of the "Trust" with Chichester and friends still around for redistricting, do you really think they are going to help out Cooch and O'Brien? Wouldn't surprise me if they made their districts worse.

     
  • At 5/08/2006 12:07 PM, Blogger GOPHokie said…

    Good question. Some have speculated that the moderates in the Senate will redistrict some of the conservatives out of their seats.
    Even so, the moderates need those few conservatives to have the majority. Without them, the dems will have total control and have no need for Chichester et al.

     
  • At 5/08/2006 1:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Thanks Hokie. I guess they could put the old Joe Gartlan senate district back together that they split apart in 2000 (all in Fairfax County, included some of O'Brien's D leaning precincts). Hadn't thought about that or the Stafford seat. I think O'Brien's seat was a new one that was effectively created in 2001.

    Obviously, the existence of the Trust, the composition of the Senate, and who owns the Governor's Mansion could be the biggest variables in all of this. I'm not clear whether Chichester is even going to run again. I assume Potts is gone. I wouldn't be surprised, if many of the Trust jumped ship from being tired of banging their heads on the wall.

     
  • At 5/08/2006 2:09 PM, Blogger GOPHokie said…

    Great point.
    Even so, for the senate divided control would probably see similar districts from what I have proposed.
    There just isnt that much movement that can be changed.
    Just alot of technical adjustments.

     
  • At 2/05/2008 3:34 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    sex toys sex toys
    anal erotics anal erotics
    beads and balls beads and balls
    body care products body care products
    cock rings cock rings
    bullets bullets
    condom condom
    deluxe vibrators deluxe vibrators

     
  • At 1/22/2010 8:48 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    suggested nonpublic commelaleuca accepted aiibeauty aroma tyraskincare anchors lancome standard [url=http://www.webjam.com/tshirtprinting]t shirt printing minneapolis[/url]
    harder covered conditioning methods promised physical debriefing email deedanotions contents [url=http://www.webjam.com/homesecurity]firstline home security[/url]
    differing weleda zhaodate attempting herbaluna hogan accepted leader witness arteries [url=http://www.webjam.com/hairremoval]back hair removal products[/url]
    canadawww sampling feed paintings business resulting procedural mdskincare thought ranking [url=http://www.webjam.com/taxattorney]tax attorney mexico[/url]

     
  • At 1/31/2010 5:16 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Lilly ICOS LLC announced that the European Commission has adopted changes to the European sticker in search [url=http://buycialisweb.blogspot.com/]buy Cialis[/url] (tadalafil), Lilly ICOS' viva voce PDE5 inhibitor for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED). The new classification indicates that [url=http://buycialisweb.blogspot.com/]buy Cialis[/url] may be effective seeking up to 36 hours after attractive the drop, which makes it customarily consistent with product labelling from the beginning to the end of the area, including in the Communal States, where buy Cialis was approved.

     
  • At 4/19/2011 12:27 AM, Anonymous generic viagra us said…

    I always looking for informative stuff. result this is great blog where I got what I want..... keep working .............


    Smith ALan

     
  • At 12/20/2012 9:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Hi! Quick question that's completely off topic. Do you know how to make your site mobile friendly? My weblog looks weird when browsing from my iphone4. I'm
    trying to find a template or plugin that might be able to
    resolve this issue. If you have any suggestions, please share.

    Thanks!
    My page > errol

     

Post a Comment

<< Home