Elephant Ears

This blog is dedicated to the political happenings in the Valley and Southwest Virginia. As the the name implies, this blog will have posts based on what is heard by this elephant's (GOPer's) ears. It is also a great treat to get while at the county fair or a carnival.

Tuesday, April 24, 2007

Race is On in the 28th

As campaign season heats up, the 28th Senate District looks to potentially be a very competitve race. As you all know, the dems have convinced former Del. Albert Pollard from the northern neck to run for this seat.

The GOP nomination seems to be a bit more murky right now. Intially, it appeared John Van Hoy would be the default candidate due to his support and closeness to 1st District Chair Russ Moulton and being on State Central. Since then two more Stafford candidates have emerged: Joe Graziano, a narrowly defeated supervisor candidate; and Jonathon Myers, a long time party activist and GOP committee secretary. Had there been a convention, one these three candidates would have virtually been guaranteed the nomination due to Stafford having control of the process.

Instead, the method of nomination will be firehouse primary. This opens the possibily of a candidate from the northern neck having a shot; especially with 3 Stafford candidates in the race.

In light of this, former Westmoreland County Commonwealth's Attorney Richard Stuart has thrown his hat into the GOP nomination battle. Under most circumstances, he would have virtually no shot at the nomination. Even so, this particular situation lends itself to him potentially securing it.

First off, we are assuming that the three Stafford candidates will all have a decent showing in the Stafford/Fauquier area. Each has their own strengths and weaknesses; but it would appear they should each get a pretty equal portion of the votes in this area. Conversely, Stuart should have a good shot at securing nearly all the votes in the northern neck. Van Hoy has family and business connections in that area, but it still seems likely that Stuart will carry the day by a wide margin here.

From the 2005 GOP Gubentorial primary, total votes cast looked like this:
Stafford County: 2483
Fauquier County: 345
Frederickburg: 119
Prince William: 37
Total for Stafford Area: 2984

King George County: 420
Lancaster: 540
Northumberland: 469
Richmond County: 197
Westmoreland: 281
Total Northern Neck Area: 1907

As you can see, intially the northern neck has a severe disadvantage here. Even so, if the Stafford candidates evenly split that area they each only get around 1000 votes; while Stuart gets the 1900 from the northern neck. Whats more is that because of the dynamics of this race, Stuart may be able to even garner votes in the Stafford area b/c he has the best chance of winning. Let me explain:

First off, the dem opponent is from the northern neck. One of the biggest concerns right now in GOP circles is that since Pollard represented all 5 northern neck counties as a Delegate, that he may be able to pull big numbers here, despite the GOP tilt of the area. Conversely, the Stafford County area is already pretty strong GOP, with no reason to change based on name ID or local dynamics. Based on this knowledge, it would appear the GOP's best bet is to run someone from the northern neck to counter Pollard's advantage there.

Local election results in the '06 Senate race look like this:

Stafford County: Allen +3903
Fauquier: Allen +917
Fredericksburg: Webb +268
Prince William: Allen +36
Total Stafford Area: Allen +4588

King George County: Allen +1158
Lancaster: Allen +787
Northumberland: Allen +947
Richmond County: Allen +638
Westmoreland: Webb +16
Total Northern Neck Area: Allen +3514

Based on this, the GOP has a bigger vote advantage in Stafford. Most of this is due to shear population; but it also plays into what I said eariler. The GOP has a strong area, with no apparent reason to see a weak showing. Conversely, the GOP has less votes in the northern neck; and Pollard could potentially make that problem worse.

Most importantly, not only is Stuart from the northern neck, but is from by far the most democratic locality in the area. Allen got 58-62% of the vote in the other 4 locales but lost Westmoreland County by several votes. Whats more is that Stuart defeated incumbent CA Peggy Garland in 2003 with 64% of the vote in that same county.

Even after all this analysis, Stuart does face two potential problems. First, is his resignation of his CA job in 2005. The article says he did it due be with his family while they experienced health problems. If that is truly the reason, that won't be much of a problem; especially since Del. Pollard retired in 2005 basically for similar reasons.
The second problem for Stuart is that he gave Del. Pollard a donation in 2001 as well as Mark Warner's Inaugural committee in 2002. Even so, apparently that wasn't enough to stop the Westmoreland GOP from giving him their party's nomination for CA in 2003. Also, Jim Webb endorsed George Allen in 2000; but that didn't stop him from defeating him 6 years later.

There is no clear indication yet what will happen in the primary, but Stuart has a major strategic advantage for both the nomination and more importantly the general election. The big question here is whether Stafford Republicans would rather risk the seat to get one of their own as a Senator, or if the GOP Senate majority is more important to them.

24 Comments:

  • At 4/24/2007 5:05 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    This scenario may very well play out, given another important factor; THERE IS NO STAFFORD GOP COMMITTEE! Zero. Zilch. Nada.

    That committee hasn't met since the fall (not Allens race, but the season) of last year, and from what most are bickering/rumoring about, it seems highly unlikely that any semblance of a committee is going to manifest its ugly head until after the firehouse primary, further weakening any 'Stafford tilt'.

    Further- I'd say that Stuarts donations to Warner and Pollard make him an ideal successor to Chichester- being both funny and serious. Chichester, love or hate him, did represent that District for a good bit of time.

     
  • At 4/24/2007 6:16 PM, Blogger GOPHokie said…

    That is a very good point Brightside.
    Could Chichester be behind this candidacy?

     
  • At 4/24/2007 7:33 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I have heard that Speaker Howell has endorsed Stuart. Any news of endorsements from Sen. Chichester or Del. Wittman?

     
  • At 4/24/2007 8:12 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I don't know but I am sick of RINOs like Stuart. Howell endorses Stuart due to Chichester calling in a debt. The guy gave to Democrats for Pete's sake! And what a ringing endorsement of his opponent giving money to him. There is that little problem too of Stuart being pro-choice, pro-tax increases and wouldn't vote to end the restaurant ban on concealed/carry.

     
  • At 4/24/2007 10:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Keep living the extreme right dream, Dirk, etc. - because that district will become more and more blue in the years to come...The GOP needs to elected a moderate to hold on to the 28th.

     
  • At 4/25/2007 8:04 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    "I am not ultra, ultra conservative. I am pro-life, I support the Second Amendment, and taxes to me are a last resort. But I would never say never," Stuart said."

    ""No one person is going to have the support of all the members of our party," Chichester said yesterday.

    "He said he's backing Stuart because Stuart's fiscal philosophies are in line with his own, and because he's an independent thinker."

    Check it out: http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/042007/04252007/278753/index_html?page=1

     
  • At 4/25/2007 8:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Wait! Stuart’s fiscal philosophies are in line with Chichester’s? And Stuart says “never say never?” Folks, the time is now to get out your checkbooks and write a check to the Graziano for Senate campaign! Don’t put in a Chichester clone into office!

     
  • At 4/25/2007 8:07 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    http://www.fredericksburg.com/News/FLS/2007/042007/
    04252007/278753/index_html?page=1

    Here is the link to the article on the 28th.

     
  • At 4/25/2007 11:00 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Dirk- your last name wouldn't be 'Diggler', of Boogie Nights fame would it?

     
  • At 4/25/2007 2:33 PM, Blogger Scott Hirons said…

    Not sure if the vote analysis will hold up. This is a Fire House primary being held on a Saturday. Not nearly as many folks will vote as would in a traditional primary.

    It may turn out to be proportional, but I think more there will be a greater concentration on party activist and solid R's/conservatives making time on a Saturday to go vote. That shouldn't bold well for Stuart. It could turn out that the Chichester endorsement will hurt more than help him in this process.

     
  • At 4/25/2007 2:46 PM, Blogger GOPHokie said…

    Scott, dont forget that the conservatives will be spiltting the vote 3 ways now as well.
    The big question is whether cons outnumber moderates more than 3-1, specifically in Stafford.

     
  • At 4/26/2007 12:18 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Stafford would be served by having the two "conservatives" who haven't run for elected office before drop out and let Graziano whip Richard "RINO" Stuart in the primary and Pollard in the General.

     
  • At 4/26/2007 12:29 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Dirk- exactly the opposite.

    The fool that already ran for elected office- AND LOST - in a year and county that saw a CONVICTED COKE ADDICT DEFEAT AN INCUMBANT---- your boy GRAZIANO, should sit this one out.

    Why not let Myers and VanHoy have a shot- one-on-one, so regardless of who wins or loses, one of the two Stafford candidates can garner enough votes to out pace Stuart.

    Geez- your boy lost to Jack Cavalier of all people- why in the world would you believe he could beat Pollard. Is it the kool-aid or reefer, or combination of the two?

     
  • At 4/26/2007 4:04 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Mr. Stuart and his family were highly visible in an early fundraiser for the Jerry Kilgore campaign held in Westmoreland, which proves how flawed one's judgement can be. However, I was there too and later decided to support toll-road Tim instead of the anit-civil libertarian Kilgore. Mr. Stuart did indeed have to resign due to a family medical issue. I met his darling daughter and any one of you would have readily resigned any office to better care for her. Men like Mr. Stuart are an inspiration to all American fathers. However, he should sit this race out. All of us who know him, like him and respect his contributions to the the Republican cause. He is no RINO; just a fine Virginian who supports candidates whom he sees as having Virginia's best interests in their hearts. Blind loyalty to the Party has never been a requirement, nor should it be. As for the 28th, your principle flaw is to presume that the Neck will vote in unison for Mr. Stuart; something that past primary results do not fully support.

    Democrat Pollard owned the 99th as Delegate (practically everyone owed his family money!), but the more Republican Stafford area will give him trouble. His record is to the left of Barbara Boxer.

    By the way, Westmoreland is home to the most backward and in-bred psychopaths in all of America. Many of these people have never ventured out of the area since their families first moved there and began marrying their cousins in the 1800's. If you recall the movie, Deliverance, then you have a general idea of what the typical Northern Neck character is like. Not just stupid, but dangerously stupid. So don't expect rational behavior in the voting booth, or any where else in Westmoreland. If you do have to travel there, be sure to arm yourself prior to embarking on your journey. Sure it is true that Washington and Lee both lived on the Neck, but what is not often discussed is how both of those men got the devil out of there as soon as they could!

     
  • At 4/27/2007 8:37 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Mr. Not-So-Bright-side, I don't think Myers nor Van Hoy know what they are in for. They have never been the candidate before regardless of the past elections they have taken part of. It is a whole different story when you run for office yourself. I appreciate your bringing our Joe Graziano's past election experience. He has been through the rigors of an election and knows what he has entered. The time isn't right for a newbie to step in and get overwhelmed in their first election.

    Remember, even Newt Gingrich had to run THREE times before he won. Fortunately, he didn't listen to not so bright folks like you even after the second defeat. Without Gingrich, we wouldn't have had the leadership guiding us into the GOP revolution in '94. Now is the time for the other two to take the high ground and graciously bow out and support Graziano in winning the primary and general. We know better than to ask Stuart if he'll support Graziano in the general. His Democrats might not approve.

     
  • At 4/29/2007 8:06 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I think this "rigors of the election" stuff is silly at this point in the race. At least three of the candidates have been going through the "rigors" and none seem to be collapsing under the pressure.

    Virginia Virtucon has some really good commentary on this race. Both Grazziano and Myers have given blog-style interviews, and since I can't get out to the NN to see any of the forums they've been holding there, it's been VERY helpful to me as voter.

    Based on what I've seen, Myers is the best, most qualified candidate. I'm very impressed with his military and his non-military background. He seems like a funny guy who tells it like it is. Joe Grazziano really didn't answer any of the questions he was asked-- it was like he was trying to impress people with his writing skills.

    I don't know much about Richard Stuart (no website, he hasn't been to my county to talk, etc.), but anyone who donates more money to Republicans than Democrats, who openly admits to being pro-life, who has indicated in no uncertain terms that he will raise taxes, and who is a LAWYER for goodness sakes is certainly NOT getting my vote.

    I think people are underestimating Jon Myers. Here's his website: www.votejonmyers.com.

     
  • At 5/01/2007 8:24 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Mr. Brightside,

    How wrong you are. Not only does Stafford have a GOP committee, they seem to have turned the tables on you and your convention and gotten it back to a primary so more Republicans can participate. Even with their infighting (which appears to be spread across the 1st) they can act. Sorry to break it to you

     
  • At 5/04/2007 10:08 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Jon myers will win this race, maybe barely, but he will win.

     
  • At 5/09/2007 6:55 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I just heard Joe Graziano dropped out of the race- anyone else hear this?

     
  • At 5/10/2007 8:42 AM, Blogger Joe Graziano for the 28th! said…

    Graziano didn't drop out.

     
  • At 5/12/2007 8:17 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    I've seen on SEVERAL blogs that Grazziano dropped out. No kidding. Anyone know if this is true or not?? I wouldn't be surprised (he doesn't appear to have much of a following), but it's so close to the election. Seems like a strange time to drop out!

     
  • At 5/12/2007 2:21 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Wow, really?! I read a lot of blogs and you are the only idiot suggesting it.

     
  • At 5/12/2007 9:53 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    To be fair, the rumor is just in the comments I've seen (not the original blog post), but I have seen it in at least two places now. Here (see above a few comments) and then on another site with a black background. I can't remember which one it was, but I saw it just this morning!

     
  • At 5/13/2007 12:53 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said…

    Two doesn't equal several. Anyways, it isn't correct but keep trying to fan the flames. Your boy Myers is going to be handed a defeat.

     

Post a Comment

<< Home